2013 Was a Terrible Year for Evolution
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/01/02/2013-was-a-terrible-year-for-evolution.html
There are evidences for natural evolution while the creation by a non-universal force is still a possible hypothesis. The fault of Darwinian evolutionary theory to show final evidences is due Modern Synthesis still studying only micro-evolution ( biological evolution is merely a cycle inside the big macro process of evolution, called cosmological evolution). At Matrix/DNA Theory we are discovering that biological evolution is influenced by mechanisms that has ruled cosmological evolution, from particles to atoms to galaxies. These mechanisms are necessary for understanding mutations and transformations of shapes. For us at Matrix/DNA the natural history of this Universe has no more secrets, but, our problems now are related to what's going on outside the Universe, where all laws must be reversed, so, all possibilities must be considered.
outros posts anteriores:
The problem is not the real natural process of evolution and real facts of origins hidden under the Bible's scripture. It is all about human interpretations, as discovered now by a new and different interpretation of those real facts, called Matrix/DNA Theory. The facts that Science and the Bible deal with are the same, the interpretations of evolutionists are 50% right and 50% wrong, while the interpretations of Christians are just 50% right where evolutionists are 50% wrong, and vice-versa. Evolution of biological systems is a fact, the problem is the neo-Darwinian theory, pointing out wrong interpretations of real mechanisms and non-complete, since that the three variables VSI - Variation, Selection, Inheritance - are merely half history because the variable are seven, not three. The problem is that Darwin and reductionism has separated Cosmological Evolution and Biological evolution into two blocks without any link between then, and it is a big mistake. Then, the four variable acting here over evolution are not seen, producing gaps and denying the effort of explanations, which are opportunistically used by creationists.
Genesis, Adam and Even in the Paradise, were not revealed by supernatural beings, it was the memory of ancient people remembering by flashes the history of our ancestors comprising 13,7 billion years, history registered at the memory of our DNA at the center of neurons. But those flashes were wrong interpreted, the Paradise is the right description of ancestors at the state of thermodynamic system under equilibrium by metaphors.
See a little bit of Matrix/DNA interpretation and discover how it is just the factor that is missing for keeping faith and Science, everybody will be happy.
respostas:
@MatrixDNA You sound like the guy on the corner who seems to say very complicated stuff but under close examination everyone realizes that he is "off his rocker", so to speak. Almost every explaination for creationism I've ever heard hinges on some small unsubstantiated and/or unprovable idea.
My "enlightened" friend, I don't say complicated stuff because I merely describes the natural world which is very simple. It is ironic the modern culture has complicated interpretations of natural phenomena with high mathematical masturbations at a level that now they are enable to go back to real nude Nature, and says that nature is complicated, not them!... I am saying what I am watching here, at Amazon jungle, listening to elements that were real witnesses of the origins of this biosphere, still untouched and alive. They talks also about their memories when their ancestors were galaxies, atoms, particles at the primordial chaos. My one thousand thesis are provable ideas, scientifically falsifiable, since we get the new necessary tools for doing it. Cheers, you are invited to came here taking a shower of real world for fight the addiction of mathematics metaphysics that grows under air-conditioning.
Maybe he's a Scientologist !
@killdeer @TheElightenment @MatrixDNA What's a scientogist? My friends here at Amazon jungle ( monkeys, natives, etc.) asks if it is something good for eating?
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Jan 21, 2014
Evolution is not a bona-fide scientific theory. There is no experiential evidence/science/knowledge about pond scum to all evolution...
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN "There is no experiential evidence/science/knowledge about pond scum to all evolution."
Of course, there isn't ! Evolution produced the ingredients at that pond scum, and not the pond scum produced evolution. Yours problem is that you does not know the very logical theoretical model of the building blocks of astronomical systems and atoms, from who came the evolution and from who cames the non-living genes that were hidden from you at that pond scum. If you know the models you will see that it is very more logical than the Bible's narrative.
