It's the same type of straw man argument that's made about evolution, that evolution says: "we all originated from from some chemicals and lightning bolts". Evolution is silent on how life started; the theory is about how life evolved after it started. Life's origins is another discipline altogether: Abiogensis.
Likewise The Big Bang theory doesn't hypothesize about where the expansion came from or what started it. The Big Bang Theory is a melding of Einstein's Theory of Relativity and The Standard Model of Particle Physics and these two theories aren't compatible at the high energy densities at or before the universe's origin ("The Planck Regime"). So the mathematical tools used to construct the Big Bang Theory aren't suited to explain where the universe came from and it's not part of the theory.
But the expansion of the universe after that is what the Big Bang Theory is about and it has been hugely successful in predicting: The Cosmic Background Radiation, Hubble's Law redshift of photons, Motion of Galaxies, Nucelosynthesis and most recently BICEP2's discovery of gravity wave patterns
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ver este interessante artigo:
.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário